Obres | https://www.gerhard-richter.com/
Gerhard Richter was born in Dresden on 9th February 1932, the first child of Horst and Hildegard Richter. A daughter, Gisela, followed four years later. They were in many respects an average middle-class family: Horst worked as a teacher at a secondary school in Dresden and Hildegard was a bookseller who liked to play the piano. In an interview with Robert Storr, Richter described his early family life as “simple, orderly, structured – mother playing the piano and father earning money.
While too young to be drafted into the German army during the Second World War, the war nonetheless had a deep impact on Richter. The family experienced economic hardship and personal loss: Hildegard’s brothers, Rudi and Alfred, and sister, Marianne, all died as a consequence of the war. “It was sad when my mother’s brothers fell in battle. First the one, then the other. I’ll never forget how the women screamed,”Richter recalls. Marianne, who suffered from mental health problems, was starved to death in a psychiatric clinic.
Even though Waltersdorf was spared the extensive bombing that nearby Dresden was exposed to, it was not sheltered. Speaking to Jan-Thorn Prikker, Richter has said: “the retreating German soldiers, the convoys, the low-flying Russian planes shooting at refugees, the trenches, the weapons lying around everywhere, artillery, broken down cars. Then the invasion of the Russians […] ransacking, rapes, a huge camp where us kids sometimes got barley soup.”13 As a child, the military had fascinated Richter: “When the soldiers came through the village, I went up to them and wanted to join them. He explained to Storr: “when you’re twelve years old you’re too little to understand all that ideological hocus- pocus.”15 Richter remembers playing in the woods and trenches with his friends, shooting with forgotten rifles which they found lying around.
Richter’s interest in art and culture began to take shape in the aftermath of the Second World War. He receives a simple plate camera as a Christmas gift from his mother. Werner Jungmichel, a camera shop owner in Waltersdorf teaches the young Richter how to develop photographs, a skill that will prove useful throughout his career.
Around the age of 15, Richter started to draw regularly. One of his early sketches, from 1946, was a nude figure copied from a book, which his parents reacted to with both pride and embarrassment. He also created landscapes and self-portraits, working mainly with watercolours.
Soon after leaving the theatre, Richter applied to study painting at the Hochschule für Bildende Künste Dresden [Dresden Art Academy]. It is unclear whether he had been planning to do so, or whether his dismissal prompted him to consider a fresh start. But it was clearly a decision to which he remained committed, even after his first application was rejected. The examiners advised him to find a job with a state-run organisation, as state employees were given preferential treatment in applications at the time. During the following eight months Richter worked as a painter at the Dewag textile plant in Zittau. In the summer of 1951, he returned to his birth city Dresden, ready to begin his formal art studies.
Although a traditionally conservative institution, in the 1950s the Academy appeared almost liberal in comparison with the Soviet authorities – whose agenda was increasingly imposed on the Academy during Richter’s time there. “The goal was socialist realism and the Dresden Academy was especially obedient in this regard.” In conversation with Jan Thorn- Prikker, Richter said: “It became increasingly ideological. For example, we weren’t able to borrow books that dealt with the period beyond the onset of Impressionism because that was when bourgeois decadence set in.” The study of this modern period of experimentation, identified as ‘formalist art’ by the authorities, was not permitted. There were, however, exceptions. Picasso and Renato Guttoso, for example, were tolerated because of their outspoken support of communism. Richter took the opportunity to engage with such artists when he could, being unsatisfied with the Academy’s insistence on socialist realism. Yet he has remained appreciative of his time there, acknowledging that “the training I received had a great influence on me.”
A turning point came when Richter visited documenta II, taking place in Kassel in 1959. Seeing works by Jackson Pollock, Jean Fautrier, and Lucio Fontana made Richter aware that “there was something wrong with my whole way of thinking,”35 seeing their work as an “expression of a totally different and entirely new content.”36 The exhibition made clear to Richter the creative prohibitions imposed on him, especially in terms of using abstraction as a painterly method. This, and the worsening conditions of the Cold War, led Richter and Ema to decide that they would leave the GDR for West Germany. According to Elger, in March 1961, just a few months before construction of the Berlin Wall began, Richter travelled to Moscow and Leningrad as a tourist, carrying more luggage than he needed. On the journey back, he remained on the train as it went through to West Germany, where he got off and left his bags in storage at the train station. He then returned to Dresden to meet Ema. A friend drove them to East Berlin, where they took the underground train to the West, declaring themselves as refugees on arrival.
In the 1960s, the Academy was at the forefront of developments in the art world. In addition to being a bastion of Informel painting, it became a hub for the Fluxus movement when Joseph Beuys was appointed professor. Düsseldorf and nearby Cologne offered a vibrant community of artists, exhibitions and events – energised not least by the ZERO group, founded by Otto Piene and Heinz Mack in 1957. Richter had arrived in the midst of all this, and many aspects of this environment would remain sources of long-lasting inspiration.
Towards the end of his studies at the Düsseldorf Academy, Richter had laid the foundations for his practice, setting up an interchange between photography and painting that was to be equally important for him as for later art-historical accounts of the Post-War period.
Despite the eclecticism of Richter’s early practice, he was manifestly drawn to certain subjects – affinities that were to become more apparent over the course of the coming years. Military aircraft, family portraits (of his own family and others) and groups of people were characteristic of Richter’s works from this time, including The Liechti Family [CR:117], Meeting [CR: 119], and Hunting Party [CR: 121]. Images found in newspapers and magazines recurred as source material for these paintings.
These paintings point to Richter’s interest as a student in Art Informel. Unlike the soft and calculated blurring of his photo paintings, the Inpaintings are distinguished by gestural impasto, with the sweeping, swirling path of the brush marks clearly visible. This method could be detected in a number of earlier works: the townscapes and streak paintings of 1968-69, the Constellation paintings of 1969 and several individual pieces such as Two Women at a Table [CR: 196-2], Untitled (Grey) [CR: 194-6], Grey [CR: 247-13] and Untitled (Evening) [CR: 293-3]. The group Untitled (Green) [CR: 313-319] demonstrates the logic of the Inpaintings; based in the figuration of Park Piece [CR: 310] they move into the increasing abstraction of the brown, grey, and red-blue-yellow series of 1972.
Figurative work such as the 1975 series entitled Seascape [CR: 375-378], depicting a desolate arctic sea, also carries a melancholy, inspired by Caspar David Friedrich’s The Wreck of Hope.
1977 saw a breakthrough in two directions. Richter created two sculptural pieces made of panes of glass painted in grey: Pane of Glass [CR: 415/1-2] and Double Pane of Glass [CR: 416]. The grey surface was altered through the intervention of glass, or more specifically, reflection, something Richter would explore further in the 1990s and early 2000s.
Landscapes also confirmed their position in Richter’s oeuvre in the 1980s. Ever since his Corsica paintings [CR: 199-201, 211, 212] of the late 1960s, Richter had periodically returned to the subject, each time integrating it further with his core themes. While the Davos paintings [CR: 468/1-3, 469-1] of 1981 and the Iceberg paintings [CR: 496/1-2] of 1982 had extended Richter’s interest in the sublime and German romanticism, landscape paintings of 1983 and 84 were more down to earth, depicting rural farmland areas. In works such as Barn [CR: 549-1], Meadow [CR: 549-2] and Rhinescape [CR: 550-3] it is the Rhineland, close to Richter’s home, which is presented. The Abstract Paintings [CR 551/1-9] that follow on from these landscapes in 1984 show how closely aligned Richter’s figurative and abstract work really was, with blue skies and horizons serving to anchor otherwise entirely abstract marks. In 1985, Richter produced a number of landscapes including Staubach [CR: 572-1], Troisdorf [CR: 572-2] and Buschdorf [CR:572-5] that were more subdued and set the tone for his future landscapes, which Dietmar Elger observes “culminated in 1987 with twenty-three field and meadow pieces.”
In 1991, he returned to the medium of mirrors, which he had first explored a decade earlier in four pieces [CR: 470/1-2, 485/1-2]. In 1989 Richter had the chance to work with glass and colour for a private commission [Stained-Glass Window, 625 Colours, [703]]. The combination offered a fertile terrain for Richter, and 1991 saw him complete an array of works that drew on this dormant interest in minimalist abstraction. According to the official catalogue raisonné of Richter’s work, three rectangular works entitled Mirror, Grey [CR: 735/1-3] were produced first, using glass coated with grey pigment. The grey works were immediately followed by eight works entitled Mirror, Blood Red [CR: 736/1-8] and then by two pairs with complementary colour schemes, Corner Mirror, Brown-Blue [CR: 737-1] and Corner Mirror, Green-Red [CR: 737-2]. Almost 20 more grey mirrors then followed before the end of 1992.
At the turn of the century, Richter remained focused on his Abstract Paintings – three paintings of his young son Moritz being the most notable exception [CR: 863/1-3]. Eight Grey [CR: 874/1-8] of 2001 heralded a number of works that continued the experimentation with glass. Works such as Pane of Glass [CR: 876-1], 4 Standing Panes [CR: 877-1] and 7 Standing Panes [CR: 879-1] demonstrated an interest in pushing wall-based works into the realm of the sculptural. Themes that the artist had worked with for a long time – transparency, translucency, opacity and reflection – took centre stage.